Organic Syntheses, Vol. 75, 161
2-TRIMETHYLSILYLETHANESULFONYL CHLORIDE (SES-Cl)
Submitted by Steven M. Weinreb
1, Charles E. Chase
1, Peter Wipf
2, and Srikanth Venkatraman
2.
Checked by Geoffrey R. Heintzelman and Robert K. Boeckman, Jr..
1. Procedure
Caution! Although
tert-butyl perbenzoate is one of the safest peresters/peroxides to handle, one should remain aware of the inherent shock sensitivity and instability of these compounds. Users should exercise appropriate caution during concentration procedures.
A. Sodium β-trimethylsilylethanesulfonate (1). To a
500-mL, round-bottomed flask (Note
1) flushed with
argon and equipped with a
magnetic stirring bar is added
vinyltrimethylsilane (28.0 mL, 18.2 g, 181 mmol),
methanol (70 mL), and
tert-butyl perbenzoate (0.70 mL, 0.70 g, 3.6 mmol) (Note
2),(Note
3),(Note
4). To this solution is added a solution of
sodium bisulfite, NaHSO3, (36.1 g, 347 mmol) in 70 mL of water (Note
5),(Note
6),(Note
7). The flask is equipped with a Claisen adapter bearing an
immersion thermometer and
reflux condenser, and the resulting suspension is heated in an
oil bath at 50°C under
argon for 48 hr (Note
8). The suspension is concentrated on a
rotary evaporator (Note
9) and (Note
10) followed by azeotropic removal of the residual water with
methanol (2 × 25 mL).
Methanol (200 mL) is added to the resulting white solid, and the resulting suspension is stirred vigorously for 10 min. The mixture is filtered through a pad of Celite into a 500-mL, round-bottomed flask, and the filtrate is concentrated on a rotary evaporator (Note
11). The filter cake is resuspended in
200 mL of methanol and stirred vigorously for 10 min, filtered into the vessel containing the original filtrate, and further concentrated (Note
11). The preceding operations are repeated again on the filter cake. After the final concentration of the combined filtrates (Note
11), the resulting white solid is dried (100°C and 0.1 mm) for 12 hr (Note
12) to give
29.0-31.9 g (
78-86%) of crude
sodium β-trimethylsilylethanesulfonate as white flakes with mp
>310°C (Note
13).
B. 2-Trimethylsilylethylsulfonyl chloride (2). The 500-mL, round-bottomed flask containing
sulfonate salt 1 (29.0 g) is equipped with a magnetic stirring bar and a
pressure-equalizing addition funnel fitted at the top with a
silicone oil bubbler connected through a
rubber septum. The apparatus is purged with
argon. The sodium sulfonate is cooled to 0°C in an
ice-water bath and the addition funnel is charged with
80 mL (1.10 mol) of thionyl chloride (SOCl2) (Note
14). The slow, dropwise addition of SOCl
2 to
1 is accompanied by generation of
sulfur dioxide, SO2 (Note
15). After addition of the SOCl
2 is complete, the addition funnel is removed, and the flask is fitted with a rubber septum and bubbler.
N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF) (0.40 mL, 0.38 g, 5.2 mmol) (Note
16) is slowly added via syringe resulting in a substantial increase in the evolution of SO
2(Note
17). The solution is stirred for an additional 20 min at 0°C during which time evolution of SO
2 ceases. The reaction mixture is warmed to room temperature and stirred overnight, resulting in a white precipitate (Note
18). The reaction flask is fitted with a
short path distillation head and excess SOCl
2 is distilled off at reduced pressure (Note
19). Twice the resulting white paste is diluted with
50 mL of hexanes and the residual SOCl
2 and hexanes are removed under reduced pressure. The resulting pale tan slurry is once again diluted with
50 mL of hexanes and the slurry is filtered through a pad of Celite. The filter cake is washed with an additional
50 mL of hexanes and the combined filtrate and washings are concentrated to afford
23.5 g of a light brown oil (Note
20). Short path distillation of the crude oil using an oil bath as heat source (70-75°C at 0.2 mm) affords
19.3 - 22.0 g (
68-77% yield, or
53-66% overall yield from
vinyltrimethylsilane) of the sulfonyl chloride
2 (Note
21) and (Note
22) as a pale tan oil.
2. Notes
1. The submitters employed a
250-mL flask. The checkers found that use of a larger vessel (500 mL) minimized problems associated with bumping during removal of volatile material (see (Note
10) below).
2.
Vinyltrimethylsilane was purchased from Aldrich Chemical Company, Inc., and used without further purification.
3.
Spectrophotometric grade methanol was purchased from Fisher Scientific Company and used without further purification.
4.
tert-Butyl perbenzoate (98%) was purchased from Aldrich Chemical Company, Inc., and used without further purification.
5. Increasing the concentration of both the methanolic and aqueous solutions results in a 20-30% decrease in the yield of sodium salt
1.
7. A fine suspension of
NaHSO3 forms immediately. Although the reactants are soluble in
22% (v/v) aqueous methanol, no improvement in the yield of
1 is observed.
8.
The reaction should be conducted behind appropriate shielding. Maintaining the internal temperature of the reaction mixture at 50°C is imperative in order to obtain good yields of
1 [the bp of
vinyltrimethylsilane (55°C) should not be exceeded]. Alternatively, the submitters employed a sand bath and the whole assembly was insulated with glass wool. The checkers found that temperature control was more easily achieved with an oil bath and did not employ glass wool insulation.
9.
Caution! Peroxides may be present. The checkers observed a negative test for peroxides on the filtrate using acidified starch/iodide test paper prior to the final concentration and drying. The checkers recommend testing for peroxides prior to the final concentration and drying.
10. The mixture tends to bump upon concentration.
11. Do not concentrate to dryness. After the third extraction, removing the last
25 mL of methanol on a rotary evaporator at atmospheric pressure and 70°C prevents bumping.
12. The 500-mL flask should be tared in advance, and after breaking up the large chunks of salt
1, the product can be dried sufficiently in the flask by placing the flask in a vacuum oven, or by applying heat directly to the flask with a sand bath at the same temperature and pressure.
13. NMR spectral data for
1 are as follows:
1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d
6) δ: −0.05 (s, 9 H), 0.76-0.82 (m, 2 H), 2.25-2.31 (m, 2 H);
13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d
6) δ: −1.6, 12.1, 46.6.
14.
SOCl2 was purchased from Aldrich Chemical Company, Inc., and used without further purification.
15. The addition is carried out at a rate that maintains the reaction temperature between 0-10°C (20-30 min). If the temperature is increased beyond this range prior to dissolution of
1, substantial formation of the sulfonyl anhydride occurs.
16.
DMF was purchased from J. T. Baker Inc. and used without further purification.
17.
Caution! Do not add
DMF to the reaction mixture through the pressure equalizing addition funnel.
18. The reaction can be monitored by
1H NMR spectroscopy by removing 0.1-mL aliquots, filtering through glass wool, and diluting with CDCl
3. The diagnostic peaks are: δ 3.55-3.63 (m, 2 H)
(2); 3.42-3.51 (m, 4 H) (sulfonic anhydride); 2.26-2.35 (m, 2 H) (salt
1).
19. Using a
water aspirator and a
warm water bath is sufficient. Recovered
SOCl2 can be recycled.
20.
1H NMR spectrum indicates that the crude product is comprised of a mixture of the sulfonyl chloride
2 and the sulfonic anhydride in an 11:1 ratio. Pure sulfonyl chloride
2 is obtained by distillation. Alternatively, the crude sulfonyl chloride can be chromatographed (
60 g of silica gel per 1 g of sulfonyl chloride) eluting with
hexane to provide pure
2 in equivalent yields.
21.
Caution! If a sufficiently high vacuum is not maintained, the increased temperature (pot temperatures >100-110°C) required for distillation may cause thermal decomposition of
2 and evolution of
hydrogen chloride. The checkers observed that
2 had bp
95-100°C at 0.5 mm. Kugelrohr distillation (85-100°C at 0.3-0.5 mm) of the product in two batches can also be employed.
22. NMR spectral data for
2 are as follows:
1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl
3) δ: 0.13 (s, 9 H), 1.30-1.36 (m, 2 H), 3.60-3.66 (m, 2 H);
13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl
3) δ: −2.3, 11.7, 63.2.
Waste Disposal Information
All toxic materials were disposed of in accordance with "Prudent Practices in the Laboratory"; National Academy Press; Washington, DC, 1995.
3. Discussion
Sodium sulfonate
1 has previously been prepared from
NaHSO3 and
vinyltrimethylsilane using
sodium nitrite/sodium nitrate as the radical initiator.
3 In the submitters hands this protocol resulted in salt
1 as a pale tan powder in only
15-53% yield if
50% (v/v) aqueous methanol is employed as solvent. The yield of
1 could be increased to
63% if
22% (v/v) aqueous methanol is employed. An advantage of this method is the elimination of a potentially explosive perester as radical initiator. However, lower yields of
1 and the subsequent lower yield of the sulfonyl chloride
2 (53% for the sulfonylation, 35% overall from
vinyltrimethylsilane) make this procedure less desirable than the method presented. The use of
tert-butyl perbenzoate as the radical initiator
4 not only provides
1 in a higher yield, but the subsequent conversion to
2 also proceeds in better yield.
Sulfonyl chloride
2 has previously been prepared from salt
1 and
phosphorus pentachloride, PCl5 in
carbon tetrachloride, CCl4.
5 The disadvantage of this procedure is the difficulty in avoiding sulfonic anhydride formation. Using this method, the
1H NMR spectrum of the crude reaction mixture prior to distillation indicates a 2-4:1 mixture of
2 and the corresponding sulfonic anhydride. Although the sulfonic anhydride can also serve as an efficient sulfonylating agent (sulfonylation of
ammonia resulted in the corresponding sulfonamide in 99% yield), and for most purposes the crude mixture of
2 and the sulfonic anhydride can be used directly, limiting the formation of the sulfonic anhydride is economically desirable. Sulfonyl chloride
2 can be synthesized from
β-trimethylsilylethanesulfonic acid (obtained from salt
1 by ion exchange chromatography) and
PCl5 in
CCl4, although there seems to be no advantage in using the acid.
3 Both sodium salt
1 and the corresponding triethylammonium salt, when treated with
triphenylphosphine, PPh3, and
SO2Cl2, provide
2 in
62% and
79% yields, respectively.
6 Sulfonyl chloride
2 has also been prepared from
β-trimethylsilylethylmagnesium chloride and
sulfuryl chloride in
50% yield.
3
The use of a catalytic amount of
DMF in
SOCl2 here is based on the work of Bosshard.
7 The advantage of this procedure is the ability to minimize the formation of the sulfonic anhydride. At 0°C
1 is reasonably soluble and unreactive in
SOCl2, thereby minimizing local high salt concentrations. Upon slow addition of
DMF to the mixture, the resulting Vilsmeier-Haack reagent efficiently catalyzes the formation of
2 from
1. Sulfonyl chloride
2 can be stored in a freezer at −15°C for months without any significant decomposition.
Sulfonyl chloride
2 is used to protect primary and secondary amines as the corresponding sulfonamide.
8 The SES-protected amines are stable compounds that can be readily cleaved by fluoride sources to regenerate the parent amine.
Appendix
Chemical Abstracts Nomenclature (Collective Index Number);
(Registry Number)
2-Trimethylsilylethanesulfonyl chloride: Ethanesulfonyl chloride, 2-(trimethylsilyl)- (12);
(106018-85-3)
tert-Butyl perbenzoate: Peroxybenzoic acid, tert-butyl ester (8); Benzenecarboperoxoic acid, 1,1-dimethylethyl ester (9);
(614-45-9)
Sodium β-trimethylsilylethanesulfonate: Ethanesulfonic acid, 2-(trimethylsilyl)-, sodium salt (9);
(18143-40-3)
Vinyltrimethylsilane: Silane, trimethylvinyl- (8); Silane, ethenyltrimethyl- (9);
(754-05-2)
Thionyl chloride: (8, 9);
(7719-09-7)
N,N-Dimethylformamide: CANCER SUSPECT AGENT: Formamide, N,N-dimethyl- (8, 9);
(68-12-2)
Copyright © 1921-2002, Organic Syntheses, Inc. All Rights Reserved